Home Multi-Country Search About Admin Login
Cenozoic
Mesozoic
Paleozoic
Neoproterozoic
Mesoproterozoic
Paleoproterozoic

Search by
Select Region(s) to search
Hold Ctrl (Windows/Linux) or Command (Mac) to select multiple
Goru Formation
Click to display on map of the Ancient World at:
Goru Fm base reconstruction

Goru Fm


Period: 
Cretaceous

Age Interval: 
Cenomanian


Province: 
NW.India Rajastan-Jaisalmer Basin

Type Locality and Naming

SUBSURFACE. A Well drilled in Kharatar area. [Original Publication: Verdier, A.C., Willm, C and Brajon, J. 1967. Completion report on Kharatar wells No.1 and 2 (KT-1 and KT-2) Jaisalmer Project, ONGC-IFP report (unpublished)]. Reference well: Well Lang-2, interval 2375-2940 m

Synonyms: The nomenclature of this formation is drawn from Pakistan where the formation with same name and age exists. This was originally designated by Williams (1959).


Lithology and Thickness

Sandy claystone. In a type well section of the Kharatar area, the lithology is grey to greenish grey, moderately hard, feebly calcareous, occasionally pyritic shale along with calcareous siltstone and fine-grained clayey, micaceous sandstone. The formation is capped by a marl bed.

Dasgupta (1975) sub-divided this formation into two members, which are Lower Goru Member, Upper Goru Member.

[Figure 1: Stratotype of Goru Formation, Mesozoic Lithostratigraphy of the Jaisalmer Basin, Rajasthan, Journal of the Paleontological Society of India, Vol. 51(2) (after Singh N.P, 2006)]

[Figure 2: Generalized and Subsurface Stratigraphy of Jaisalmer Basin (from dghindia.gov.in)]


Lithology Pattern: 
Sandy claystone


Relationships and Distribution

Lower contact

Lower boundary of the formation is conformable with the underlying Pariwar Formation and is placed between the grey to olive green highly glauconitic claystone and the clayey sandstone of Goru Fm and Pariwar Fm, respectively.

Upper contact

The upper contact is conformable with clayey limestone of overlying Parh Formation which changes to a dominantly marl sequence in Lang area of Shahgarh sub-basin.

Regional extent

[Figure 3: Stratigraphic Correlation of Rajasthan Basins (from dghindia.gov.in)]


GeoJSON

{"type":"Feature","geometry":{"type":"MultiPolygon","coordinates":[[[[70.32,27.14],[71.87,27.6],[71.63,27.42],[71.98,27.15],[71.63,26.44],[71.01,26.32],[70.7,26.52],[70.32,27.14]]]]}}

Fossils

Lower Goru Member is poorly fossiliferous particularly in its lower part. General Aptian-Albian age is tentatively suggested for this part (Sigal, 1965 and Narayanan and Krishna, 1983). The upper part of Lower Goru with the identification of planktonic zone - Hedbergella washitensis - Planomalina buxtorfi.

Upper Goru Member is fairly rich in microfauna Sigal (1965) and Mehrotra and Singh (1968) reported a diversified planktonic foraminiferal assemblage including: Rotalipora cushmani, Thalmanninella Gr. brotzeni, Praeglobotruncana stephani, Globotruncana turbinata etc.


Age 

Aptian to Cenomanian (ca. 100 to 94 Ma)

Age Span: 

    Beginning stage: 
Cenomanian

    Fraction up in beginning stage: 
0.0

    Beginning date (Ma): 
100.50

    Ending stage: 
Cenomanian

    Fraction up in the ending stage: 
0.9

    Ending date (Ma):  
94.56

Depositional setting

The litho-association and faunal assemblages recorded from the formation suggest an overall transgressive shallow marine environment approaching deeper bathymetry in the upper part.


Depositional pattern:  


Additional Information


Compiler:  

D.S.N Raju